Re: SEM rules pushed into production again

[Kevin A. McGrail]

Sorry for posting to both dev and users but it looks like the SEM lists have been pushed into production rules again and are showing up in 72_active.cf under 3.3.1. This happened around 23:00 (GMT-4) last night. Someone fix that? Thanks Blaine, There is a good temporary fix at http://www.spamtips.org/2011/03/sem-rules-mistakenly-enabled-how-to.html (Synopsis: add these to your local.cf) score RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK    0 score URIBL_SEM           0 score URIBL_SEM_FRESH     0 score URIBL_SEM_FRESH_10  0 score URIBL_SEM_FRESH_15  0 score URIBL_SEM_RED       0 However, I am trying to see if I agree but all I see is T_* rules.  These rules may fire but will only have a score of 0.01.  I see a lot of T_ rules so is it incorrect behavior that T_ rules are promoted? 72_active.cf:describe  T_RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK    Received from an IP listed in bl.spameatingmonkey.net 72_active.cf:describe  T_URIBL_SEM          Contains a URI listed in uribl.spameatingmonkey.net 72_active.cf:describe  T_URIBL_SEM_FRESH    Contains a domain registered less than 5 days ago 72_active.cf:describe  T_URIBL_SEM_FRESH_10 Contains a domain registered less than 10 days ago 72_active.cf:describe  T_URIBL_SEM_FRESH_15 Contains a domain registered less than 15 days ago 72_active.cf:describe  T_URIBL_SEM_RED      Contains a URI listed in urired.spameatingmonkey.net Karsten, was your patch on https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 supposed to block T_ rules?  To me, it looks like the rules are in a sandbox and marked as test and they are published as T_ so it could still be used in nightly masscheck. In short, this sounds like things are working and unless Blaine is seeing a rule being published that isn't T_*, we don't have an issue. Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail President Peregrine Computer Consulting Corporation 3927 Old Lee Highway, Suite 102-C Fairfax, VA 22030-2422 http://www.pccc.com/ 703-359-9700 x50 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free) 703-359-8451 (fax) kmcgr...@pccc.com