https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6344
--- Comment #7 from Jason Bertoch <[email protected]> --- > > This thread is mainly about Bayes and that DNSWL may be decreasing the socre > somewhat, but DNSWL is not the culprit. > > Users can easily implement the rule modifications in their site config. > > -1 for such a change. I've seen this argument numerous times throughout the development of SA, but it's extremely arrogant. It assumes that all SA users follow the dev process from beginning to end and are also subscribed to all mailing lists. The truth is that this product is more far reaching than some people here seem to respect. Just because it may be trivial for someone on the list to implement (or adjust) some feature, doesn't mean it's trivial everywhere SA may be deployed. Even though I've followed this project from the beginning, I still think we have a duty to make sane decisions on default configs. Just because you may want the defaults to fit your situation, that doesn't mean those defaults are appropriate for the project s a whole. In fact, since you are clearly able to modify the settings, the defaults should likely differ greatly from your situation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
