https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6344
--- Comment #11 from AXB <[email protected]> --- I'm not convinced this will solve what most ppl are seeing: few rule hits = low scores and one of the rules includes DNSWL. >From the reports, bayes alone would seldom raised the score above threshold either, unless they're constantly feeding bayes from traps or some other automated method. Imo, we're all focusing on DNSWL and RCVD_IN_RP_* but the problem is somewhere else, and unless we see more samples of the messages which cause these false negatives we're pretty much guessing what could help. I'd prefer to question the trust & scores we give DNSWL and RCVD_IN_RP_* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
