https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6344
--- Comment #14 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > I continually keep circling back to the fact that > > rules should score appropriately with minimal false hits. That includes > > hammy rules. > > As I said before, we don't have any meaningful QA mechanism for this. Barring an automated mechanism, I think someone to perform SOME analysis. I don't think anyone is disagreeing perhaps the scores are too highly weighted but see some issues with modifying bayes to accommodate scores. At the very worst, make this noautolearn change and/or the score and report back on the impact you think it has had would be better than where we are at now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
