+1 for this. Noting the problem at 'info' is good.

On 20 Nov 2019, at 13:41, Henrik K wrote:

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:29:10PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
anybody against this diff ?

 Giovanni

Index: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm
===================================================================
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm        (revision 1870052)
+++ lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm        (working copy)
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@
if ($rcode eq 'REFUSED' || $id =~ m{^\d+/NO_QUESTION_IN_PACKET\z}) {
             # the failure was already reported above
           } else {
-            info("dns: no callback for id %s, ignored; packet: %s",
+            dbg("dns: no callback for id %s, ignored; packet: %s",
                  $id,  $packet ? $packet->string : "undef" );
           }
           # report a likely matching query for diagnostic purposes

If you would check trunk it's already there. Please use the same code for
uniformity.

info("dns: no callback for id $id, ignored, packet on next debug line");
            # prevent filling normal logs with huge packet dumps
            dbg("dns: %s", $packet ? $packet->string : "undef");


--
Bill Cole
[email protected] or [email protected]
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire

Reply via email to