On 2022-05-07 15:19, Henrik K wrote:
3) a better patch :=)
Sorry, I tried reading three times, but I don't understand your
suggestion..
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hege.li; s=hege2;
t=1651929565; bh=mDJa8KTm9fQckBvDRBvqjvPDd2nTerfIP3931ZK07fQ=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=awKAzs8isiW1Kxq04b2g1pnn5lLt+4VLiyJH9ai0V/YyOy0TLi3ajY7TtFgz5abf5
ioZMIvY9aIAk5swUr6yGEnEZqG/5yW2hiId5Vb78Vwj4PoGwuO1WxRNE+8VdlrRkFf
StgfHdXlle+6wqJ5H47fzBIobEvoEM0C3g/QKJbhys0sGzrjbEqVzAKIETzACaGVG+
8EWwYM7utrUnENIaf48/M3kL5qFReJJ32Fzol7x1G1O7qoBQT4zrB1cnQ19Tt6tpRR
InkL7nZx4cPXx4laYiTxiymQkEHxwqD43AXGzdng/BESAYeEImU4zHZSHBwNXJ2Mah
Ej8ihZ2Zi+m4g==
From is twise in above
i think dkim h= could be trusted in bayes, instaed of defining untrusted
bayes_header_ignore randomheader
in local.cf
bayes_trust_header From
bayes_trust_header Date
bayes_trust_header To
etc
all other header as axb did would still be untrusted then
hope i have explaned it well now
