On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2022-05-07 16:55, Henrik K wrote: > > On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 04:47:37PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > > So no header would be tokenized by default, unless there is > > > > "bayes_allow_header From To Received" etc. > > > > > > yes i belive this is "install and forget", needed good headers dont > > > change > > > > Who knows what are "good headers" > > trusteddomains aka opendkim have a list of required headers to sign, for > bayes we could trust them aswell instad of make a list of onwanted headers
It makes no sense to get a list of headers from "somewhere" like opendkim, it has no relevance on what Bayes should use. > > JM is not around anymore so no one knows what to do with the > > Bayes engine.. > > outsource bayes to dspam ? :=) You realise that dspam has also been dead for years? :-) > it was not what i meant with tired it to dkim, only point was use same > headers as dkim to get stable bayes header list I'm sure we can figure out what common email headers are by ourselves without referring to DKIM.