On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 04:47:37PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > So no header would be tokenized by default, unless there is > > "bayes_allow_header From To Received" etc. > > yes i belive this is "install and forget", needed good headers dont change
Who knows what are "good headers" and if random spammer added headers make any difference.. all this would require running days of "10-fold cross validation", JM is not around anymore so no one knows what to do with the Bayes engine.. > > Dunno, it might help or might not. Would the allow list be actually any > > shorter, and would it be maintainable in the long run? > > atleast axb list is longer and not dkim signed :) > > i dont know if dkim signed headers is what to limit to, but it imho makes > sense to only bayes based on this headers, and hope emails that is not dkim > signed dont use other usefull headers for bayes I don't see why DKIM should be mixed up with Bayes. Anyone can add DKIM headers, and making Bayes wait for network lookups is complete waste. "Good headers" for Bayes are irrelevant to that..
