On 2022-05-10 06:44, Henrik K wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
I have not researched all of those, but I believe that some of those
should in theory be useful in Bayes.
So is someone going to research them then? And the 268 older headers
that
axb already implemented?
Honestly I couldn't care less, since I've already ignored them locally.
Just figured they would save few database bytes globally. This is not
something I want to waste time running 10-fold cross validations anyway.
why have that bayes_ignore_header support in spamassassin in the first
place then ?
we could add one single option, ignore ALL headers ?
saves much more in bayes :)
Just at a guess, ignoring any header that is a long string of gibberish >
say 16 bytes is probably worthwhile. All of the stuff I see in headers of
that sort seems to be related to spam tracking on various platforms.
