great thanks i will do that

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Koert:
> If you have time, you can try this diff - with which you would be able to
> specify the following on the command line:
> -Dscalastyle.failonviolation=false
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index 687cc63..108585e 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@
>      <log4j.version>1.2.17</log4j.version>
>      <hadoop.version>1.0.4</hadoop.version>
>      <protobuf.version>2.4.1</protobuf.version>
> +    <scalastyle.failonviolation>true</scalastyle.failonviolation>
>      <yarn.version>${hadoop.version}</yarn.version>
>      <hbase.version>0.94.6</hbase.version>
>      <flume.version>1.4.0</flume.version>
> @@ -1071,7 +1072,7 @@
>          <version>0.4.0</version>
>          <configuration>
>            <verbose>false</verbose>
> -          <failOnViolation>true</failOnViolation>
> +          <failOnViolation>${scalastyle.failonviolation}</failOnViolation>
>            <includeTestSourceDirectory>false</includeTestSourceDirectory>
>            <failOnWarning>false</failOnWarning>
>            <sourceDirectory>${basedir}/src/main/scala</sourceDirectory>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Ted,
>> i tried:
>> mvn clean package -DskipTests -Dscalastyle.failOnViolation=false
>>
>> no luck, still get
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.scalastyle:scalastyle-maven-plugin:0.4.0:check (default) on project
>> spark-core_2.10: Failed during scalastyle execution: You have 3 Scalastyle
>> violation(s). -> [Help 1]
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Koert:
>>> Have you tried adding the following on your commandline ?
>>>
>>> -Dscalastyle.failOnViolation=false
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Koert,
>>>>
>>>> I think disabling the style checks in maven package could be a good
>>>> idea for the reason you point out. I was sort of mixed on that when it
>>>> was proposed for this exact reason. It's just annoying to developers.
>>>>
>>>> In terms of changing the global limit, this is more religion than
>>>> anything else, but there are other cases where the current limit is
>>>> useful (e.g. if you have many windows open in a large screen).
>>>>
>>>> - Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > 100 max width seems very restrictive to me.
>>>> >
>>>> > even the most restrictive environment i have for development (ssh with
>>>> > emacs) i get a lot more characters to work with than that.
>>>> >
>>>> > personally i find the code harder to read, not easier. like i kept
>>>> > wondering why there are weird newlines in the
>>>> > middle of constructors and such, only to realise later it was because
>>>> of
>>>> > the 100 character limit.
>>>> >
>>>> > also, i find "mvn package" erroring out because of style errors
>>>> somewhat
>>>> > excessive. i understand that a pull request needs to conform to "the
>>>> style"
>>>> > before being accepted, but this means i cant even run tests on code
>>>> that
>>>> > does not conform to the style guide, which is a bit silly.
>>>> >
>>>> > i keep going out for coffee while package and tests run, only to come
>>>> back
>>>> > for an annoying error that my line is 101 characters and therefore
>>>> nothing
>>>> > ran.
>>>> >
>>>> > is there some maven switch to disable the style checks?
>>>> >
>>>> > best! koert
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to