Matei that makes sense, +1 (non-binding) Tim
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Cheng Lian <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 since this is already the de facto model we are using. > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Wangfei (X) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> 发自我的 iPhone >> >> > 在 2014年11月5日，20:06，"Denny Lee" <[email protected]> 写道： >> > >> > +1 great idea. >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 20:04 Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Mark Hamstra <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Nicholas Chammas < >> >> [email protected] >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> +1 on this proposal. >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Will these maintainers have a cleanup for those pending PRs upon we >> >> start >> >>>>> to apply this model? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I second Nan's question. I would like to see this initiative drive a >> >>>> reduction in the number of stale PRs we have out there. We're >> >> approaching >> >>>> 300 open PRs again. >> >>>> >> >>>> Nick >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
