+1, that definitely will speeds up the PR reviewing / merging.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheng Lian [mailto:lian.cs....@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 12:46 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Designating maintainers for some Spark components

+1 since this is already the de facto model we are using.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Wangfei (X) <wangf...@huawei.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> 发自我的 iPhone
>
> > 在 2014年11月5日,20:06,"Denny Lee" <denny.g....@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > +1 great idea.
> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 20:04 Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Mark Hamstra 
> >> <m...@clearstorydata.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Nicholas Chammas <
> >> nicholas.cham...@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 on this proposal.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will these maintainers have a cleanup for those pending PRs upon 
> >>>>> we
> >> start
> >>>>> to apply this model?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I second Nan's question. I would like to see this initiative 
> >>>> drive a reduction in the number of stale PRs we have out there. 
> >>>> We're
> >> approaching
> >>>> 300 open PRs again.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nick
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For 
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For 
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to