Great idea! +1 — Jeremy
------------------------- jeremyfreeman.net @thefreemanlab On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:48 PM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Matei that makes sense, +1 (non-binding) > > Tim > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Cheng Lian <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 since this is already the de facto model we are using. >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Wangfei (X) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> 发自我的 iPhone >>> >>>> 在 2014年11月5日，20:06，"Denny Lee" <[email protected]> 写道： >>>> >>>> +1 great idea. >>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 20:04 Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Mark Hamstra <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Nicholas Chammas < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 on this proposal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will these maintainers have a cleanup for those pending PRs upon we >>>>> start >>>>>>>> to apply this model? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I second Nan's question. I would like to see this initiative drive a >>>>>>> reduction in the number of stale PRs we have out there. We're >>>>> approaching >>>>>>> 300 open PRs again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
