Hi David,
Yes, we are still headed in that direction. Please take a look at the repo I sent earlier. I think that's a good starting point. Thanks, -Kushal. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, David Robinson <drobin1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am new to Spark and GraphX, however, I use Tinkerpop backed graphs and > think the idea of using Tinkerpop as the API for GraphX is a great idea and > hope you are still headed in that direction. I noticed that Tinkerpop 3 is > moving into the Apache family: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPopProposal which might alleviate > concerns about having an API definition "outside" of Spark. > > Thanks, > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-TinkerPop-on-top-of-GraphX-tp9169p10126.html > Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >
