On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Santiago Mola <sm...@stratio.com> wrote: > Sure. That is why I was talking about the Inactive resolution specifically. > The > combination of Priority + other statuses are enough to solve these issues. A > minor/trivial issue that is incomplete is probably not going to hurt much to > someone looking for critical open issues.
If you mean you intend to consider them resolved, then yeah we agree a lot. The names of the resolved states don't matter nearly so much to me. For instance, in your examples, I could call those CannotReproduce or Incomplete. I would not want to leave them Open in that state indefinitely. > On a side-note, I would like to contribute some time on improving this. When > identifying this kind of issue, should I ask in the issue itself to resolve > it in a > specific way? I think reviewing JIRAs actually contributes to a better overall process, so I'd just dive in. Anything to advance a JIRA / PR to a resolution is very helpful. Ask for more info, investigate a problem to confirm it or fail to reproduce, propose a fix, identify duplicates, flag JIRAs for closing, review changes, say you think the change is good, etc. -- among the most helpful things anyone can do right now IMHO. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
