No, that isn't necessarily enough to be considered a blocker. A blocker would be something that would have large negative effects on a significant number of people trying to run Spark. Arguably, something that prevents a minority of Spark developers from running unit tests on one OS does not qualify. That's not to say that we shouldn't fix this, but only that it needn't block a 2.0.0 release.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Ulanov, Alexander <alexander.ula...@hpe.com > wrote: > Spark Unit tests fail on Windows in Spark 2.0. It can be considered as > blocker since there are people that develop for Spark on Windows. The > referenced issue is indeed Minor and has nothing to do with unit tests. > > > > *From:* Mark Hamstra [mailto:m...@clearstorydata.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:09 PM > *To:* Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> > *Cc:* Ulanov, Alexander <alexander.ula...@hpe.com>; Reynold Xin < > r...@databricks.com>; dev@spark.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.0 (RC1) > > > > It's also marked as Minor, not Blocker. > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ulanov, Alexander > <alexander.ula...@hpe.com> wrote: > > -1 > > > > Spark Unit tests fail on Windows. Still not resolved, though marked as > > resolved. > > To be pedantic, it's marked as a duplicate > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15899), which doesn't > mean necessarily that it's fixed. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15893 > > > > From: Reynold Xin [mailto:r...@databricks.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 6:27 PM > > To: dev@spark.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.0.0 (RC1) > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > > 2.0.0. The vote is open until Friday, June 24, 2016 at 19:00 PDT and > passes > > if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.0 > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.0-rc1 > > (0c66ca41afade6db73c9aeddd5aed6e5dcea90df). > > > > > > > > This release candidate resolves ~2400 issues: > > https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.0-rc1-jira > > > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.0-rc1-bin/ > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc > > > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1187/ > > > > > > > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.0-rc1-docs/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ======================================= > > > > == How can I help test this release? == > > > > ======================================= > > > > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an > > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then > > reporting any regressions from 1.x. > > > > > > > > ================================================ > > > > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > > > > ================================================ > > > > Critical bugs impacting major functionalities. > > > > > > > > Bugs already present in 1.x, missing features, or bugs related to new > > features will not necessarily block this release. Note that historically > > Spark documentation has been published on the website separately from the > > main release so we do not need to block the release due to documentation > > errors either. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Marcelo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > > >
