Hi, That's a Solr bug Ted, we'll fix in the coming days.
I assume Spark devs would like us to index Spark email, Wiki, JIRA, etc.? Otis -- Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ tel: +1 347 480 1610 fax: +1 718 679 9190 On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > You may have noticed that the counter of searchable items for last 7 days > on search-Hadoop is 0 and the counter for last 30 days is declining quickly. > > Cheers > > On Dec 19, 2013, at 10:10 PM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > One option that is 3rd party that works nicely for the Hadoop project > and it's related projects is http://search-hadoop.com - managed by > sematext. Perhaps we can plead with Otis to add Spark lists to > search-spark.com, or the existing site? > > > > Just throwing it out there as a potential solution to at least searching > and navigating the Apache lists > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > >> On 20 Dec 2013, at 6:46 AM, Aaron Davidson <ilike...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'd be fine with one-way mirrors here (Apache threads being reflected in > >> Google groups) -- I have no idea how one is supposed to navigate the > Apache > >> list to look for historic threads. > >> > >> > >>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Mike Potts <maspo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks very much for the prompt and comprehensive reply! I appreciate > the > >>> overarching desire to integrate with apache: I'm very happy to hear > that > >>> there's a move to use the existing groups as mirrors: that will > overcome > >>> all of my objections: particularly if it's bidirectional! :) > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 7:19:06 PM UTC-8, Andy Konwinski wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hey Mike, > >>>> > >>>> As you probably noticed when you CC'd spark-de...@googlegroups.com, > that > >>>> list has already be reconfigured so that it no longer allows posting > (and > >>>> bounces emails sent to it). > >>>> > >>>> We will be doing the same thing to the spark...@googlegroups.com list > >>>> too (we'll announce a date for that soon). > >>>> > >>>> That may sound very frustrating, and you are *not* alone feeling that > >>>> way. We've had a long conversation with our mentors about this, and > I've > >>>> felt very similar to you, so I'd like to give you background. > >>>> > >>>> As I'm coming to see it, part of becoming an Apache project is moving > the > >>>> community *fully* over to Apache infrastructure, and more generally > the > >>>> Apache way of organizing the community. > >>>> > >>>> This applies in both the nuts-and-bolts sense of being on apache > infra, > >>>> but possibly more importantly, it is also a guiding principle and way > of > >>>> thinking. > >>>> > >>>> In various ways, moving to apache Infra can be a painful process, and > IMO > >>>> the loss of all the great mailing list functionality that comes with > using > >>>> Google Groups is perhaps the most painful step. But basically, the de > facto > >>>> mailing lists need to be the Apache ones, and not Google Groups. The > >>>> underlying reason is that Apache needs to take full accountability for > >>>> recording and publishing the mailing lists, it has to be able to > >>>> institutionally guarantee this. This is because discussion on mailing > lists > >>>> is one of the core things that defines an Apache community. So at a > minimum > >>>> this means Apache owning the master copy of the bits. > >>>> > >>>> All that said, we are discussing the possibility of having a google > group > >>>> that subscribes to each list that would provide an easier to use and > >>>> prettier archive for each list (so far we haven't gotten that to > work). > >>>> > >>>> I hope this was helpful. It has taken me a few years now, and a lot of > >>>> conversations with experienced (and patient!) Apache mentors, to > >>>> internalize some of the nuance about "the Apache way". That's why I > wanted > >>>> to share. > >>>> > >>>> Andy > >>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Mike Potts <masp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I notice that there are still a lot of active topics in this group: > and > >>>>> also activity on the apache mailing list (which is a really horrible > >>>>> experience!). Is it a firm policy on apache's front to disallow > external > >>>>> groups? I'm going to be ramping up on spark, and I really hate the > idea of > >>>>> having to rely on the apache archives and my mail client. Also: > having to > >>>>> search for topics/keywords both in old threads (here) as well as new > >>>>> threads in apache's (clunky) archive, is going to be a pain! I > almost feel > >>>>> like I must be missing something because the current solution seems > >>>>> unfeasibly awkward! > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>>> Groups "Spark Users" group. > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send > >>>>> an email to spark-users...@googlegroups.com. > >>>>> > >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >>>> > >>>> >
