Just a thought: if the mirroring was bidirectional (between apache lists and google groups) -- meaning that you could read/write via either channel and everything would be mirrored in both groups -- would that be a bad thing? The apache lists would be comprehensive and available as a first-class communications channel; and so would the google groups: I would have thought the benefits of maintaining both channels (fully mirrored) would outweigh any drawbacks... but again I'm probably missing something :)
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to Apa... Otis Gospodnetic
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to Apache by Se... Andy Konwinski
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to Apache ... Matei Zaharia
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to Apa... Mike Potts
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to... Andy Konwinski
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Mike Potts
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Patrick Wendell
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to Apa... Andy Konwinski
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to... Mike Potts
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Andy Konwinski
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Mike Potts
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Andy Konwinski
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Mike Potts
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists moving to... Evan Chan
- Re: IMPORTANT: Spark mailing lists movin... Patrick Wendell