Just a thought: if the mirroring was bidirectional (between apache lists 
and google groups) -- meaning that you could read/write via either channel 
and everything would be mirrored in both groups -- would that be a bad 
thing?  The apache lists would be comprehensive and available as a 
first-class communications channel; and so would the google groups: I would 
have thought the benefits of maintaining both channels (fully mirrored) 
would outweigh any drawbacks... but again I'm probably missing something :)

Reply via email to