+1
On 7/6/17, 5:23 AM, "Michael Ridley" <[email protected]> wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
Seems ok to me although I'm not sure that we need a branch for a release we
aren't planning to make. Not totally following the thought process there, but
not something I'm particularly concerned about.
Michael Ridley
Senior Solutions Architect
Cloudera
Sent from my mobile.
Pardon any spelling errors.
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Ever Sandoval Apache <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As you may already know we’re working on the upcoming release of Apache
> Spot (Incubating) 1.0 aka SPOT-154.
>
> In preparation for the coming release (1.0) we would like to start a
voting
> process to create a branch Spot 0.9. Since entering the Apache Incubator
we
> have not officially labeled Spot with a version, In order to make things
> clear and understandable, we would like to propose the following:
>
> - Prior to start the release process we would like to create a branch
> called Spot-0.9 that will capture the code as it is today.
> - After the creation of Spot-0.9 we will start the release process in
> order to merge SPOT-154 to the master branch.
>
>
>
> This voting process will be open for the next 3 days. Please feel free to
> bring up any concerns and let me know your feedback,
> Regards
