+1 - nathanael
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Barona, Ricardo <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 7/6/17, 10:49 AM, "Edwards, Brandon" <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 7/6/17, 5:23 AM, "Michael Ridley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > +0 (non-binding) > > Seems ok to me although I'm not sure that we need a branch for a > release we aren't planning to make. Not totally following the thought process > there, but not something I'm particularly concerned about. > > Michael Ridley > Senior Solutions Architect > Cloudera > > Sent from my mobile. > Pardon any spelling errors. > >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Ever Sandoval Apache <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> As you may already know we’re working on the upcoming release of Apache >> Spot (Incubating) 1.0 aka SPOT-154. >> >> In preparation for the coming release (1.0) we would like to start a voting >> process to create a branch Spot 0.9. Since entering the Apache Incubator we >> have not officially labeled Spot with a version, In order to make things >> clear and understandable, we would like to propose the following: >> >> - Prior to start the release process we would like to create a branch >> called Spot-0.9 that will capture the code as it is today. >> - After the creation of Spot-0.9 we will start the release process in >> order to merge SPOT-154 to the master branch. >> >> >> >> This voting process will be open for the next 3 days. Please feel free to >> bring up any concerns and let me know your feedback, >> Regards > > > >
