+1
On 7/6/17, 10:49 AM, "Edwards, Brandon" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On 7/6/17, 5:23 AM, "Michael Ridley" <[email protected]> wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
Seems ok to me although I'm not sure that we need a branch for a
release we aren't planning to make. Not totally following the thought process
there, but not something I'm particularly concerned about.
Michael Ridley
Senior Solutions Architect
Cloudera
Sent from my mobile.
Pardon any spelling errors.
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Ever Sandoval Apache
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As you may already know we’re working on the upcoming release of
Apache
> Spot (Incubating) 1.0 aka SPOT-154.
>
> In preparation for the coming release (1.0) we would like to start a
voting
> process to create a branch Spot 0.9. Since entering the Apache
Incubator we
> have not officially labeled Spot with a version, In order to make
things
> clear and understandable, we would like to propose the following:
>
> - Prior to start the release process we would like to create a
branch
> called Spot-0.9 that will capture the code as it is today.
> - After the creation of Spot-0.9 we will start the release process
in
> order to merge SPOT-154 to the master branch.
>
>
>
> This voting process will be open for the next 3 days. Please feel
free to
> bring up any concerns and let me know your feedback,
> Regards
