Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now. On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan < [email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have > developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some > other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix version > of the bug though if there are no more RCs. > > Venkat > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker. > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to > > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is definitely > a > > > nice to have for connector developers. > > > > > > -Abe > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Built and ran tests on the sources > > >> Verified checksums and signatures > > >> No RAT violations > > >> Check License, notices .. > > >> > > >> Good work folks. > > >> > > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of other > > >> preoccupations. > > >> > > >> Venkat > > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files > > >> > * Ran tests > > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 > > >> > * Ran an import job and export job > > >> > * Ran batch script for import > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < > > [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > > > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files > > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file > > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...) > > >> > > * Run tests > > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 > > >> > > > > >> > > Jarcec > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira < > [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly. > > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, > > we’ve > > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache > Sqoop > > >> 2, > > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Change log: > > >> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5): > > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The tag to be voted on: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The KEYS file: > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS > > >> > > > > > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its > > signed > > >> > > > with my keys) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Keep calm and vote, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Gwen > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -- > > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > entity > > >> to > > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is > confidential, > > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > > reader > > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > > >> that > > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender > > >> immediately > > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
