Did another round o sanity testing for 1.99.4 Found a issue with docs : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1753
Best, *./Vee* On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, its fairly minor. > We'll put it in if we need another release candidate. > > Thanks for the votes and comments Jarcec, Venkat and Abe :) > > Gwen > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Agreed. I'll tentatively change the fix version now. > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Venkat Ranganathan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Looking at the description it is a good to have this but given we have > >> developer previews, agree it is OK to live with it unless there is some > >> other change that warrants a respin We do need to change the fix > version > >> of the bug though if there are no more RCs. > >> > >> Venkat > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Just to state my perspective, it does not appear to be a blocker. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hmm just noticed something. I've forgotten to backport SQOOP-1636 to > >> > > branch-1.99.4. Do you guys think this is a blocker? This is > definitely > >> a > >> > > nice to have for connector developers. > >> > > > >> > > -Abe > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Venkat Ranganathan < > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> Built and ran tests on the sources > >> > >> Verified checksums and signatures > >> > >> No RAT violations > >> > >> Check License, notices .. > >> > >> > >> > >> Good work folks. > >> > >> > >> > >> Sorry I was missing in action for the last few weeks because of > other > >> > >> preoccupations. > >> > >> > >> > >> Venkat > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Abraham Elmahrek < > [email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> > > >> > >> > * Verified checksums and signature files > >> > >> > * Ran tests > >> > >> > * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 > >> > >> > * Ran an import job and export job > >> > >> > * Ran batch script for import > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > +1 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > * Verified checksums and signature files > >> > >> > > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license > file > >> > >> > > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...) > >> > >> > > * Run tests > >> > >> > > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Jarcec > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira < > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members, > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly. > >> > >> > > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, > >> > we’ve > >> > >> > > > packaged up a new release candidate. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache > >> Sqoop > >> > >> 2, > >> > >> > > > version 1.99.4 is ready. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Change log: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5): > >> > >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/ > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The tag to be voted on: > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1 > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > The KEYS file: > >> > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its > >> > signed > >> > >> > > > with my keys) > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Keep calm and vote, > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Gwen > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > >> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > >> entity > >> > >> to > >> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is > >> confidential, > >> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > >> > reader > >> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified > >> > >> that > >> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > >> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have > >> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender > >> > >> immediately > >> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > entity to > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > reader > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You. > >> >
