Hi, I am -1 for making this the default.
I would prefer to keep the default really simple. If people want security they have to do something for it. This is true for most systems and frameworks that I know about. - Fabian 2012/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > Hi all, > > Currently stanbol security is only enabled when stanbol is started with the > -s option. I think it would be better to start it with security enabled by > default. This follows the "priciple of least damage" as the harm caused > when a "disable security" option is forgotten is much smaller than the > potential damage when arbitrary users can suddenly act with all privileges. > > Any objection to such a change? > > Reto > -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
