On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Fabian Christ <[email protected]
> wrote:

> 2012/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>
>
> > Even the stable launcher starts with many
> > optional components.
> >
>
> Maybe we should look at launchers not as a defined product. The launchers
> we have are just for testing and do not reflect any default or standard.


> I would expect people to create their own launchers for their specific
> needs and use cases.
>
I fully agree. My suggestion is that if somebody decides to have security
as part of their launcher they should not have to additionally enable it.
The full launcher is there that developers can see if their component work
together well with all the others (this includes security).

Cheers,
Reto

Reply via email to