I want to add: Making this the default would also be contrary to our discussion about having the security part optional in Stanbol.
2012/11/28 Fabian Christ <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I am -1 for making this the default. > > I would prefer to keep the default really simple. If people want security > they have to do something for it. This is true for most systems and > frameworks that I know about. > > - Fabian > > > 2012/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> >> Currently stanbol security is only enabled when stanbol is started with >> the >> -s option. I think it would be better to start it with security enabled by >> default. This follows the "priciple of least damage" as the harm caused >> when a "disable security" option is forgotten is much smaller than the >> potential damage when arbitrary users can suddenly act with all >> privileges. >> >> Any objection to such a change? >> >> Reto >> > > > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt > -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
