That's great. Lets talk on Wednesday evening. As usual results need to be documented and published on the mailing (eventually voted) on the mailing lists.
@Rafa: Do we need to do anything in preparation of the call? best Rupert On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > Seems like next Wednesday (March 16th) at 5pm is a good fit for everyone. > > I think we can close the survey now :-) > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is the link to the Doodle for the meeting date: >> >> http://doodle.com/poll/w5giz2egtb4kpyyc >> >> Cheers, >> Rafa >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 PM Rupert Westenthaler < >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think the new Sling Provisioning model [1] could be really helpful >>> in implementing this. But ATM I do not have the time to look further >>> into this option. We should anyway migrate your launchers to this >>> model as the current model is deprecated by now. >>> >>> best >>> Rupert >>> >>> [1] https://sling.apache.org/documentation/development/slingstart.html >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Regarding the releases, we should find a way for distributing binaries >>> > releases in order to prevent final users to build Stanbol by themselves. >>> > The problem with OpenNLP models could be probably resolved by including >>> a >>> > downloading tool within the releases. >>> > >>> > IMHO an important part of the Hangout discussion should be release 1.0 >>> cut. >>> > And probably at some point we are going to need to stop supporting >>> 0.12.x >>> > development. >>> > >>> > wdyt? >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Rafa >>> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM Rupert Westenthaler < >>> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> >>> >> Regarding the path forward the main points are >>> >> >>> >> * releasing 0.12.1 >>> >> * @Fabian would be nice if you could help me with this >>> >> * deciding how to deal with the Clerezza API changes >>> >> * upgrading will means maintaining 0.12.1 and 1.0.0 becomes much >>> >> more difficult because >>> >> * delaying the upgrade means to use outdated Clerezza dependencies >>> >> * do we want to update before a full 1.0.0 release? >>> >> * path to a full 1.0.0 release >>> >> >>> >> best >>> >> Rupert >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Cristian Petroaca >>> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Hi Fabian, >>> >> > >>> >> > I've been working on Event Extraction Engine. Trying to figure out >>> if a >>> >> > rule based approach makes sense. >>> >> > >>> >> > Cristian >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> HI Fabian, Rupert, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> We have been working on regular expression based fact extraction >>> >> engine. I >>> >> >> just need to prettify it a little and it will be ready for >>> contribution. >>> >> >> @Rupert I will send the doodle ASAP. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Cheers, >>> >> >> Rafa >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:59 AM Rupert Westenthaler < >>> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Hi Fabian, >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Nothing special from my side. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Not for the report - but just to let you know - >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > I just implemented a new feature that allows to wait for >>> (re-)creation >>> >> >> > of FST corpora after changes in the Solr Index. While doing so I >>> >> >> > discovered a major Issue with the FST linking engine >>> (STANBOL-1448) >>> >> >> > that can especially affect users of Entityhub Managed Sites. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Both together will now allow to use FST linking that does >>> consider the >>> >> >> > most current version of the SolrCore (given that the Core is small >>> >> >> > enough that building FST models does not take longer as 10sec). >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > I would also like to go on with the discussed Hangout. @Rafa, can >>> you >>> >> >> > create a Doodle so that we can find a date for such a meeting. >>> Also >>> >> >> > feel free to assign me some task for the preparation of such. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > best >>> >> >> > Rupert >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Fabian Christ >>> >> >> > <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> > > Hi Stanbolers, >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > even if we have reported last month, we have to report again >>> this >>> >> month >>> >> >> > to >>> >> >> > > be back on the regular schedule. >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > So anything you would like to see in the report? Remember that >>> we >>> >> have >>> >> >> to >>> >> >> > > report on the project and its progress. We do not report >>> technical >>> >> >> issues >>> >> >> > > or implementation details here. >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > Best >>> >> >> > > Fabian >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> >> >> > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>> ++43-699-11108907 >>> >> >> > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> >> >> > | REDLINK.CO >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> .......................................................................... >>> >> >> > | http://redlink.co/ >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> >> | REDLINK.CO >>> >> >>> .......................................................................... >>> >> | http://redlink.co/ >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>> | REDLINK.CO >>> .......................................................................... >>> | http://redlink.co/ >>> >> -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/
