Hi all, could you also let me join?
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > Absolutely not Andrew, please join us > > Cheers, > Rafa > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:04 PM Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Any objection to an interested newbie joining the call to listen? >> (Assuming you don't hit the Hangout limit with existing developers) >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:38 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The link for today's Hangout: >>> https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/c4kmtbmw6ze57gvzvllqmv52jee >>> >>> See you in a while! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rafa >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:17 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rupert, >>>> >>>> It would be nice for everyone to take a look at least into Jira to >> check >>>> current project situation >>>> >>>> Also, from my side, I have a couple of ideas or features to discuss >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Rafa >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:42 AM Rupert Westenthaler < >>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's great. Lets talk on Wednesday evening. As usual results need to >>>>> be documented and published on the mailing (eventually voted) on the >>>>> mailing lists. >>>>> >>>>> @Rafa: Do we need to do anything in preparation of the call? >>>>> >>>>> best >>>>> Rupert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> Seems like next Wednesday (March 16th) at 5pm is a good fit for >>>>> everyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we can close the survey now :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the link to the Doodle for the meeting date: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://doodle.com/poll/w5giz2egtb4kpyyc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Rafa >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 PM Rupert Westenthaler < >>>>>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think the new Sling Provisioning model [1] could be really >> helpful >>>>>>>> in implementing this. But ATM I do not have the time to look >> further >>>>>>>> into this option. We should anyway migrate your launchers to this >>>>>>>> model as the current model is deprecated by now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>> Rupert >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>> https://sling.apache.org/documentation/development/slingstart.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regarding the releases, we should find a way for distributing >>>>> binaries >>>>>>>>> releases in order to prevent final users to build Stanbol by >>>>> themselves. >>>>>>>>> The problem with OpenNLP models could be probably resolved by >>>>> including >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> downloading tool within the releases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IMHO an important part of the Hangout discussion should be >> release >>>>> 1.0 >>>>>>>> cut. >>>>>>>>> And probably at some point we are going to need to stop >> supporting >>>>>>>> 0.12.x >>>>>>>>> development. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Rafa >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM Rupert Westenthaler < >>>>>>>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the path forward the main points are >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * releasing 0.12.1 >>>>>>>>>> * @Fabian would be nice if you could help me with this >>>>>>>>>> * deciding how to deal with the Clerezza API changes >>>>>>>>>> * upgrading will means maintaining 0.12.1 and 1.0.0 becomes >>>>> much >>>>>>>>>> more difficult because >>>>>>>>>> * delaying the upgrade means to use outdated Clerezza >>>>> dependencies >>>>>>>>>> * do we want to update before a full 1.0.0 release? >>>>>>>>>> * path to a full 1.0.0 release >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>> Rupert >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Cristian Petroaca >>>>>>>>>> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've been working on Event Extraction Engine. Trying to >> figure >>>>> out >>>>>>>> if a >>>>>>>>>>> rule based approach makes sense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cristian >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> HI Fabian, Rupert, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We have been working on regular expression based fact >>> extraction >>>>>>>>>> engine. I >>>>>>>>>>>> just need to prettify it a little and it will be ready for >>>>>>>> contribution. >>>>>>>>>>>> @Rupert I will send the doodle ASAP. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Rafa >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:59 AM Rupert Westenthaler < >>>>>>>>>>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Fabian, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing special from my side. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not for the report - but just to let you know - >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just implemented a new feature that allows to wait for >>>>>>>> (re-)creation >>>>>>>>>>>>> of FST corpora after changes in the Solr Index. While >> doing >>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>> discovered a major Issue with the FST linking engine >>>>>>>> (STANBOL-1448) >>>>>>>>>>>>> that can especially affect users of Entityhub Managed >> Sites. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Both together will now allow to use FST linking that does >>>>>>>> consider the >>>>>>>>>>>>> most current version of the SolrCore (given that the Core >> is >>>>> small >>>>>>>>>>>>> enough that building FST models does not take longer as >>>>> 10sec). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to go on with the discussed Hangout. >>> @Rafa, >>>>> can >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> create a Doodle so that we can find a date for such a >>> meeting. >>>>>>>> Also >>>>>>>>>>>>> feel free to assign me some task for the preparation of >>> such. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Fabian Christ >>>>>>>>>>>>> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Stanbolers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if we have reported last month, we have to report >>> again >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> month >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be back on the regular schedule. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So anything you would like to see in the report? >> Remember >>>>> that >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> report on the project and its progress. We do not report >>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or implementation details here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler >>>>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>>>>>>> ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>>>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>>>>>>>>>> | REDLINK.CO >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> .......................................................................... >>>>>>>>>>>>> | http://redlink.co/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >>>>> ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>>>>>>> | REDLINK.CO >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> .......................................................................... >>>>>>>>>> | http://redlink.co/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 >> ++43-699-11108907 >>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>>>>> | REDLINK.CO >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> .......................................................................... >>>>>>>> | http://redlink.co/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >>>>> | REDLINK.CO >>>>> >>> >> .......................................................................... >>>>> | http://redlink.co/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
