Hi Folks,

Any objection to an interested newbie joining the call to listen?
(Assuming you don't hit the Hangout limit with existing developers)


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:38 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The link for today's Hangout:
> https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/c4kmtbmw6ze57gvzvllqmv52jee
>
> See you in a while!
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:17 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rupert,
> >
> > It would be nice for everyone to take a look at least into Jira to check
> > current project situation
> >
> > Also, from my side, I have a couple of ideas or features to discuss
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rafa
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:42 AM Rupert Westenthaler <
> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> That's great. Lets talk on Wednesday evening. As usual results need to
> >> be documented and published on the mailing (eventually voted) on the
> >> mailing lists.
> >>
> >> @Rafa: Do we need to do anything in preparation of the call?
> >>
> >> best
> >> Rupert
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > Seems like next Wednesday (March 16th) at 5pm is a good fit for
> >> everyone.
> >> >
> >> > I think we can close the survey now :-)
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:27 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> This is the link to the Doodle for the meeting date:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://doodle.com/poll/w5giz2egtb4kpyyc
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Rafa
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 PM Rupert Westenthaler <
> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think the new Sling Provisioning model [1] could be really helpful
> >> >>> in implementing this. But ATM I do not have the time to look further
> >> >>> into this option. We should anyway migrate your launchers to this
> >> >>> model as the current model is deprecated by now.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> best
> >> >>> Rupert
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1]
> >> https://sling.apache.org/documentation/development/slingstart.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > Hi all,
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Regarding the releases, we should find a way for distributing
> >> binaries
> >> >>> > releases in order to prevent final users to build Stanbol by
> >> themselves.
> >> >>> > The problem with OpenNLP models could be probably resolved by
> >> including
> >> >>> a
> >> >>> > downloading tool within the releases.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > IMHO an important part of the Hangout discussion should be release
> >> 1.0
> >> >>> cut.
> >> >>> > And probably at some point we are going to need to stop supporting
> >> >>> 0.12.x
> >> >>> > development.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > wdyt?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Cheers,
> >> >>> > Rafa
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM Rupert Westenthaler <
> >> >>> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> Hi all,
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Regarding the path forward the main points are
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> * releasing 0.12.1
> >> >>> >>     * @Fabian would be nice if you could help me with this
> >> >>> >> * deciding how to deal with the Clerezza API changes
> >> >>> >>     * upgrading will means maintaining 0.12.1 and 1.0.0 becomes
> >> much
> >> >>> >> more difficult because
> >> >>> >>     * delaying the upgrade means to use outdated Clerezza
> >> dependencies
> >> >>> >>     * do we want to update before a full 1.0.0 release?
> >> >>> >> * path to a full 1.0.0 release
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> best
> >> >>> >> Rupert
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Cristian Petroaca
> >> >>> >> <cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > Hi Fabian,
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > I've been working on Event Extraction Engine. Trying to figure
> >> out
> >> >>> if a
> >> >>> >> > rule based approach makes sense.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Cristian
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> HI Fabian, Rupert,
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> We have been working on regular expression based fact
> extraction
> >> >>> >> engine. I
> >> >>> >> >> just need to prettify it a little and it will be ready for
> >> >>> contribution.
> >> >>> >> >> @Rupert I will send the doodle ASAP.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>> >> >> Rafa
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:59 AM Rupert Westenthaler <
> >> >>> >> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> > Hi Fabian,
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > Nothing special from my side.
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > Not for the report - but just to let you know -
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > I just implemented a new feature that allows to wait for
> >> >>> (re-)creation
> >> >>> >> >> > of FST corpora after changes in the Solr Index. While doing
> >> so I
> >> >>> >> >> > discovered a major Issue with the FST linking engine
> >> >>> (STANBOL-1448)
> >> >>> >> >> > that can especially affect users of Entityhub Managed Sites.
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > Both together will now allow to use FST linking that does
> >> >>> consider the
> >> >>> >> >> > most current version of the SolrCore (given that the Core is
> >> small
> >> >>> >> >> > enough that building FST models does not take longer as
> >> 10sec).
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > I would also like to go on with the discussed Hangout.
> @Rafa,
> >> can
> >> >>> you
> >> >>> >> >> > create a Doodle so that we can find a date for such a
> meeting.
> >> >>> Also
> >> >>> >> >> > feel free to assign me some task for the preparation of
> such.
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > best
> >> >>> >> >> > Rupert
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Fabian Christ
> >> >>> >> >> > <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> > > Hi Stanbolers,
> >> >>> >> >> > >
> >> >>> >> >> > > even if we have reported last month, we have to report
> again
> >> >>> this
> >> >>> >> month
> >> >>> >> >> > to
> >> >>> >> >> > > be back on the regular schedule.
> >> >>> >> >> > >
> >> >>> >> >> > > So anything you would like to see in the report? Remember
> >> that
> >> >>> we
> >> >>> >> have
> >> >>> >> >> to
> >> >>> >> >> > > report on the project and its progress. We do not report
> >> >>> technical
> >> >>> >> >> issues
> >> >>> >> >> > > or implementation details here.
> >> >>> >> >> > >
> >> >>> >> >> > > Best
> >> >>> >> >> > > Fabian
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > --
> >> >>> >> >> > | Rupert Westenthaler
> >> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> >> > | Bodenlehenstraße 11
> >> >>> ++43-699-11108907
> >> >>> >> >> > | A-5500 Bischofshofen
> >> >>> >> >> > | REDLINK.CO
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> ..........................................................................
> >> >>> >> >> > | http://redlink.co/
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> --
> >> >>> >> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> >> >>> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11
> >> ++43-699-11108907
> >> >>> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
> >> >>> >> | REDLINK.CO
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> ..........................................................................
> >> >>> >> | http://redlink.co/
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> >> >>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                              ++43-699-11108907
> >> >>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
> >> >>> | REDLINK.CO
> >> >>>
> >>
> ..........................................................................
> >> >>> | http://redlink.co/
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                              ++43-699-11108907
> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
> >> | REDLINK.CO
> >>
> ..........................................................................
> >> | http://redlink.co/
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to