I agree completely. However, I've been unable to reproduce the issue. I think we need to get more eyes on this. If anyone has the resources to do so please do.
I'm +1 for reverting, but I'd also like to have a root cause. -Taylor > On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agree with Nathan. > Seems like it doesn't prepared because we should take care of STORM-350. > > 2014-11-15 10:54 GMT+09:00 Nathan Marz <nat...@nathanmarz.com>: > >> -1. Looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350 it seems >> the >> upgrade to disruptor caused message loss issues. That upgrade should be >> reverted, or I'd like @clockfly to provide more insight. >> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: >>> >>> I am +1 releasing 0.9.3 >>> +1 on including STORM-555. >>> Thanks, >>> Harsha >>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 02:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >>>> I’d like to get the community’s opinion on releasing 0.9.3 with what is >>>> currently in the 0.9.3 branch. This would be the official release >>>> (skipping the unofficial rc2). >>>> >>>> The only addition I’d like to include is STORM-555, which should be >>>> eligible for merging early next week. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> -Taylor >>>> >>>> >>>> Email had 1 attachment: >>>> + signature.asc >>>> 1k (application/pgp-signature) >> >> >> >> -- >> Twitter: @nathanmarz >> http://nathanmarz.com > > > > -- > Name : 임 정택 > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net > Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
