I am able to reproduce this using Sean's topology. I am +1 on reverting this. Thanks, Harsha
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 06:43 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I agree completely. However, I've been unable to reproduce the issue. > > I think we need to get more eyes on this. If anyone has the resources to > do so please do. > > I'm +1 for reverting, but I'd also like to have a root cause. > > -Taylor > > > > On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Agree with Nathan. > > Seems like it doesn't prepared because we should take care of STORM-350. > > > > 2014-11-15 10:54 GMT+09:00 Nathan Marz <nat...@nathanmarz.com>: > > > >> -1. Looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350 it seems > >> the > >> upgrade to disruptor caused message loss issues. That upgrade should be > >> reverted, or I'd like @clockfly to provide more insight. > >> > >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: > >>> > >>> I am +1 releasing 0.9.3 > >>> +1 on including STORM-555. > >>> Thanks, > >>> Harsha > >>> > >>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 02:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >>>> I’d like to get the community’s opinion on releasing 0.9.3 with what is > >>>> currently in the 0.9.3 branch. This would be the official release > >>>> (skipping the unofficial rc2). > >>>> > >>>> The only addition I’d like to include is STORM-555, which should be > >>>> eligible for merging early next week. > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> -Taylor > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Email had 1 attachment: > >>>> + signature.asc > >>>> 1k (application/pgp-signature) > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Twitter: @nathanmarz > >> http://nathanmarz.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Name : 임 정택 > > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net > > Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior > > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior