I would prefer to revert it on master too, just so that if anyone decides to 
use master storm, they have a chance of getting something that, at least as far 
as we know, works.
 
- Bobby
 

     On Monday, November 17, 2014 2:58 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
   

 Okay, I’ve reverted the commit in the 0.9.3 branch. I did not revert it in 
master.

For master we can either choose to revert it there as well, or leave it and 
continue to look for a root cause. I’m open to either and would like to hear 
what other people think.

In addition to the revert of STORM-350, I also merged the following to the 
master and 0.9.3 branches:

 * STORM-558 change "swap!" to "reset!" to fix assignment-versions in supervisor
 * STORM-555: Storm json response should set charset to UTF-8

What are everyone’s thoughts on proceeding with a 0.9.3 release?

-Taylor


On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:

> Even if we cannot reproduce it in all cases, the change was rather small not 
> totally necessary.  +1 for reverting.
>  - Bobby
> 
> 
>    On Sunday, November 16, 2014 2:23 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote:
> 
> 
> I am able to reproduce this using Sean's topology. I am +1 on reverting
> this.
> Thanks,
> Harsha
> 
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 06:43 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>> I agree completely. However, I've been unable to reproduce the issue.
>> 
>> I think we need to get more eyes on this. If anyone has the resources to
>> do so please do.
>> 
>> I'm +1 for reverting, but I'd also like to have a root cause.
>> 
>> -Taylor
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Agree with Nathan.
>>> Seems like it doesn't prepared because we should take care of STORM-350.
>>> 
>>> 2014-11-15 10:54 GMT+09:00 Nathan Marz <nat...@nathanmarz.com>:
>>> 
>>>> -1. Looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-350 it seems
>>>> the
>>>> upgrade to disruptor caused message loss issues. That upgrade should be
>>>> reverted, or I'd like @clockfly to provide more insight.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am +1 releasing 0.9.3
>>>>> +1 on including STORM-555.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Harsha
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014, at 02:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>>>>>> I’d like to get the community’s opinion on releasing 0.9.3 with what is
>>>>>> currently in the 0.9.3 branch. This would be the official release
>>>>>> (skipping the unofficial rc2).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The only addition I’d like to include is STORM-555, which should be
>>>>>> eligible for merging early next week.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Email had 1 attachment:
>>>>>> + signature.asc
>>>>>>  1k (application/pgp-signature)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Twitter: @nathanmarz
>>>> http://nathanmarz.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Name : 임 정택
>>> Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net
>>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/heartsavior
>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
> 


   

Reply via email to