Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to documentation and has already been merged to trunk.
-----Original Message----- From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM To: dev@storm.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0 Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of your suggestions for the releases. Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move forward with releasing? -Taylor On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and > one essential feature PRs. > > - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690 > -- It fixes connection pool issue. > - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691 > -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary. > > Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with > storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master. > > Thanks! > > Regards > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>: > >> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance >> release) and 0.10.0 (security release). >> >> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes: >> >> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving >> reconnection strategy and buffering messages >> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to >> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist. >> >> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users. >> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m >> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional >> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4. >> >> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to >> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and >> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch for >> a full list). >> >> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding >> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing? >> >> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is >> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with 0.9.4 >> release. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Taylor >> > > > > -- > Name : 임 정택 > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter > : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn : > http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior
