+1 for releasing 0.9.4 Thomas
On 11 March 2015 at 21:39, Richard Kellogg <rmkell...@comcast.net> wrote: > Suggest we pull in STORM-559 as well. It is strictly an update to > documentation and has already been merged to trunk. > > -----Original Message----- > From: P. Taylor Goetz [mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:51 PM > To: dev@storm.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0 > > Thanks for the feedback Richard, Parth, and Jungtaek. I’ve made a note of > your suggestions for the releases. > > Does anyone else have any thoughts (esp. committers)? Should we move > forward with releasing? > > -Taylor > > On Mar 5, 2015, at 5:00 PM, 임정택 <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > storm-redis (scheduled to be released at 0.10.0) has one bugfix and > > one essential feature PRs. > > > > - bugfix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-690 > > -- It fixes connection pool issue. > > - feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-691 > > -- It provides basic lookup / persist bolts so I believe it's necessary. > > > > Furthermore, I'd like to continue to support various data types with > > storm-redis Trident, after STORM-691 is merged to master. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Regards > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > > > > 2015-03-06 2:37 GMT+09:00 P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>: > > > >> I’d like to start a discussion for releasing 0.9.4 (maintenance > >> release) and 0.10.0 (security release). > >> > >> 0.9.4 is basically a branch of 0.9.3 with two important bug fixes: > >> > >> STORM-329: fix cascading Storm failure by improving > >> reconnection strategy and buffering messages > >> STORM-130: Supervisor getting killed due to > >> java.io.FileNotFoundException: File '../stormconf.ser' does not exist. > >> > >> Both are long-standing bugs that have proven problematic for many users. > >> I’d be in favor of releasing 0.9.4 with just those two fixes, but I’m > >> interested in finding out if anyone thinks there are additional > >> patches to master that should be considered for 0.9.4. > >> > >> 0.10.0 is a much larger release in terms of changes. In addition to > >> the changes above, it includes all the new security features and > >> numerous fixes and enhancements (see the CHANGELOG in the master branch > for a full list). > >> > >> Do we feel 0.10.0 is ready for release? If not what outstanding > >> bugs/patches should we consider before releasing? > >> > >> I’m fine holding off on a 0.10.0 release if we feel there is > >> additional work to be done, but I’d like to at least move forward with > 0.9.4 release. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -Taylor > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Name : 임 정택 > > Blog : http://www.heartsavior.net / http://dev.heartsavior.net Twitter > > : http://twitter.com/heartsavior LinkedIn : > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/heartsavior > > >
