I would like to work on this as well. We have some integration tests at Yahoo
that we run regularly, but also depend on an internal testing framework, and
also depend on internal deployment scripts, etc.
It would be good to get a set of true integration tests set up that can run in
community. We could then reduce the number of tests we run internally to truly
test Yahoo specific integration needs.
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 10:51 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote:
Thanks Longda. Can you update this JIRA with list of tests cases that
you are running in this JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1179
-Harsha
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 08:32 PM, 封仲淹(纪君祥LongdaFeng) wrote:
> +1
> By the way, Tong(王桐) can work for this. Tong is responsible for the
> automatically daily JStorm test, the only problem is that the
> automatically daily JStorm test is basing on Alibaba testing framework.
> Some of the components can't run on outside.
> But we can share the test cases firstly. Then we will try to port the old
> test cases to the storm tests.
>
> regardsLongda
> ------------------------------------------------------------------From:P.
> Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>Send Time:2015年11月6日(星期五)
> 12:12To:dev@storm.apache.org <dev@storm.apache.org>Subject:Re:
> [Discusson] Storm System Tests
> +1
> I think we should experiment with this. If it can serve us well, and we
> all agree, then we should consider adopting it.
>
> From what I see:
>
> * Icense is compatible
> * fairly well documented.
>
> What potentially worries me:
>
> * Maintenance. Can we count on updates? Is the ducktape community open to
> accepting patches from us? If so, what would be the turnaround time for
> acceptance?
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Nov 5, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote:
> >
> > The reason for suggesting ducktape not just used in apache kafka but
> > also its getting security services integration like kdc and already has
> > zookeeper. This framework can work with vagrant vms or amazon ec2 etc..
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro wrote:
> >> Great, will make this a priority. Created a
> >> JIRA<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1179> ticket and
> >> assigned it to me.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1179
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Bobby Evans
> >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hugo,
> >>
> >> I would love to see that happen. It has been on my list for a while, but
> >> I have never found the time to do it. I personally am +1 on this,
> >> hopefully we can do this quickly in preparation for a 0.11.0 release.
> >>
> >> - Bobby
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thursday, November 5, 2015 1:37 PM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro
> >> <hlo...@hortonworks.com<mailto:hlo...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I a agree with these three levels of testing, and that at the very least
> >> we should keep unit tests separated from the system/integration tests.
> >> One huge advantage would be to quickly run unit tests that hopefully are
> >> more predictable, and thus avoid intermittent test fails.
> >>
> >> Bobby just mentioned but I had already in mind that it would be useful to
> >> create different maven profiles for integration and unit tests. I have
> >> done something similar in a different project and it works really well.
> >> If we agree that it is something we want to implement here, I will create
> >> a JIRA ticket for this and get it done. Please let me know.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hugo
> >>
> >>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Bobby Evans
> >>><ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID<mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I totally agree. Too many of our "unit" tests are integration tests and
> >>>end up spinning up an entire local-mode cluster.
> >>> I personally would like to see three levels of testing.
> >>> 1) true unit tests. They only touch the code under test and very little
> >>>else. The should be what you get when you run mvn test2) integration
> >>>tests. These should spin up local mode clusters and modify configs/etc to
> >>>get a decent set of more white box tests. The should run as a part of
> >>>trivis-ci, and probably should run by enabling a special profile.3) Sanity
> >>>Integration Tests. ducktape looks like a great fit here. I would love to
> >>>see us spin up an few different scenarios for testing, with/without
> >>>security. Talking to Kafka, Hadoop(HBase, HDFS, Hive), redis,
> >>>elastasearch, etc.
> >>> These would be run frequently but not necessarily a part of CI initially.
> >>> - Bobby
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 7:21 PM, Harsha
> >>><st...@harsha.io<mailto:st...@harsha.io>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> As community we are growing and adding new and exciting
> >>> features to Storm and also we've ever growing connector which
> >>> only helps in storm adoption. One thing we've severely lacking
> >>> is system tests. There are unit tests which acts as
> >>> integration tests to storm-core but there are no system wide
> >>> integration tests that can spin up kafka nodes and storm ,
> >>> hbase and run a topology that can make sure the data is
> >>> getting into hbase.
> >>> We at Hortonworks use our test topologies run some of these
> >>> tests but this integration code to spin up vms or nodes is hard
> >>> to share. In apache kafka we are using ducktape to write system
> >>> tests so far its working out good. If there are any other
> >>> frameworks you've in mind we can definitely take a look. But as
> >>> a community we need start looking at
> >>> https://github.com/confluentinc/ducktape or similar frameworks
> >>> to start writing systems tests. Ducktape makes it easy to run
> >>> in a vm or any other infrastructure. Appreciate any feedback
> >>> on this.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Harsha
> >>
> >>
> >>
