Hi Richard,

The link to "Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature
files" is missing, can you please re-send the vote mail ?

Thanks,
Alexandre

Le mar. 30 janv. 2024 à 09:42, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi ladies & lords,
>
> I have posted a first release candidate for Apache Storm 2.6.1 release
> and it is ready for testing.
>
> We fixed a few bugs and upgraded libraries.
>
> Full list of changes in this release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
>
> The Nexus staging repository is here:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1110/
>
> Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature files are here:
>
> The release artifacts are signed with my key contained in this file:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/storm/KEYS
>
> The release was made from the Apache Storm v2.6.1 tag at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/storm/releases/tag/v2.6.1
>
>
> To use it in a maven build set the version for Storm to 2.6.1 and add
> the following to your POM:
>
>
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>storm-2.6.1-rc1</id>
> <name>Testing Storm 2.6.1 RC1 </name>
> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1110/
>
> </url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
>
>
> The release was made using the Storm release process, documented on the
> GitHub repository:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Storm 2.6.0.
>
> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours or as long as needed.
>
> "How to vote" is described here:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate
>
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>
> Only votes from the Storm PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
> check the release candidate and vote.
>
> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.6.1
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Richard
>

Reply via email to