Here is my own +1 (binding)
Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 09:42 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hi ladies & lords, > > I have posted a first release candidate for Apache Storm 2.6.1 > release > and it is ready for testing. > > We fixed a few bugs and upgraded libraries. > > Full list of changes in this release: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > > The Nexus staging repository is here: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1110/ > > Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature files are here: > > The release artifacts are signed with my key contained in this file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/storm/KEYS > > The release was made from the Apache Storm v2.6.1 tag at: > > https://github.com/apache/storm/releases/tag/v2.6.1 > > > To use it in a maven build set the version for Storm to 2.6.1 and add > the following to your POM: > > > <repositories> > <repository> > <id>storm-2.6.1-rc1</id> > <name>Testing Storm 2.6.1 RC1 </name> > <url> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm- > 1110/ > > </url> > </repository> > </repositories> > > > The release was made using the Storm release process, documented on > the > GitHub repository: > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Storm 2.6.0. > > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours or as long as needed. > > "How to vote" is described here: > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. > > Only votes from the Storm PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to > check the release candidate and vote. > > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.6.1 > [ ] 0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > > Thanks! > > Richard >
