Any more votes?

Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 09:42 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Hi ladies & lords,
> 
> I have posted a first release candidate for Apache Storm 2.6.1
> release
> and it is ready for testing.
> 
> We fixed a few bugs and upgraded libraries.
> 
> Full list of changes in this release: 
>    
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.6.1-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> 
> 
> The Nexus staging repository is here:
> 
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1110/
> 
> Storm Source and Binary Release with sha512 signature files are here:
>     
> The release artifacts are signed with my key contained in this file:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/storm/KEYS
> 
> The release was made from the Apache Storm v2.6.1 tag at:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/storm/releases/tag/v2.6.1
> 
> 
> To use it in a maven build set the version for Storm to 2.6.1 and add
> the following to your POM:
> 
> 
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>storm-2.6.1-rc1</id>
> <name>Testing Storm 2.6.1 RC1 </name>
> <url>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-
> 1110/
> 
> </url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
> 
> 
> The release was made using the Storm release process, documented on
> the
> GitHub repository:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md
> 
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Storm 2.6.0. 
> 
> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours or as long as needed.
> 
> "How to vote" is described here:
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/RELEASING.md#how-to-vote-on-a-release-candidate
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> Only votes from the Storm PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
> check the release candidate and vote.
> 
> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.6.1
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Richard
> 

Reply via email to