Hi Nirmal, Thanks for bringing that up.
Since Kubernetes Group ID is given in the request body itself, shouldn't we make it PUT? Here is a good discussion about this on StackOverflow [1]. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/630453/put-vs-post-in-rest On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Nirmal Fernando <nirmal070...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera <raviha...@wso2.com> > wrote: >> >> Thanks everyone for joining the call. Really sorry about the technical >> glitches we had to face during the Hangout. >> >> Here are the meeting notes; >> >> 1. Clean up the REST API. Change the REST APIs to adhere to RESTful design >> (not only limited to Kubernetes host registration) >> >> For eg - >> >> Deploying a new Kubernetes host - >> PUT /kubernetes/group/{kubernetesGroupId}/host >> >> >> Deploying a new Kubernetes group - >> PUT /kubernetes/group/ > > > These should be POST IMO. >> >> >> 2. Remove boolean return types in AutoScalerService interface >> >> >> Adding to that what I could not discuss: >> >> 1. Shall we rename KubernetesGroup -> KubernetesCluster to make the naming >> consistent? > > > +1 >> >> >> >> Thanks. > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > Nirmal Fernando. > PPMC Member & Committer of Apache Stratos, > Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ -- Akila Ravihansa Perera Software Engineer, WSO2 Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com
