On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox. >> > > Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread > voting > on that move, again without *any* context.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E> > > > >> If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's mentioned >> before. >> > > How, in which way? > Sure, I get github and git in general, but I cannot find *any* explanation > or documentation concerning gitbox. > > I won't, can't really, vote positively on this without some context. > > > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: >> >> On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote: >>> >>> This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other >>>> projects have started to move their repos to gitbox. >>>> >>>> >>> This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1, >>> I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what >>> restrictions/limitations it imposes. >>> >>> While I suppose it to be 'cool' and 'it'll be great', as (P)PMC we >>> should *know* what we're getting (or accepting) by moving to gitbox, >>> *before* deciding. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here's my +1 binding. >>>> >>>> This vote will close in 72 hrs. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
