On 2017-07-05 22:16, Suneel Marthi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote:
On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote:
Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox.
Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single thread
voting
on that move, again without *any* context.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E>
Yes, that's the one single thread I could find.
But no argument or context there either.
Maybe everyone voting on this at openNLP already knows everything about gitbox,
or they just voted blindly, hoping for the best?
I'm happy to vote on this, but I'm still clueless for what.
If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's mentioned
before.
How, in which way?
Sure, I get github and git in general, but I cannot find *any* explanation
or documentation concerning gitbox.
I won't, can't really, vote positively on this without some context.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote:
On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote:
This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the other
projects have started to move their repos to gitbox.
This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1,
I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what
restrictions/limitations it imposes.
While I suppose it to be 'cool' and 'it'll be great', as (P)PMC we
should *know* what we're getting (or accepting) by moving to gitbox,
*before* deciding.
Here's my +1 binding.
This vote will close in 72 hrs.
