On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > > > On 2017-07-06 00:35, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > > > > > >> On 2017-07-05 22:16, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 2017-07-05 20:31, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Just this week, Apache OpenNLP moved all of their repos to gitbox. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> Hmm, just checked their mailinglists and only found one single > thread > > >>>> voting > > >>>> on that move, again without *any* context. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9b > > >>> 205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E > > >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2b7c066b79f1f13f733b9 > > >>> b205c71c57e156a7577a14b7061cbc8610@%3Cdev.opennlp.apache.org%3E> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Yes, that's the one single thread I could find. > > >> But no argument or context there either. > > >> Maybe everyone voting on this at openNLP already knows everything > about > > >> gitbox, > > >> or they just voted blindly, hoping for the best? > > >> > > >> I'm happy to vote on this, but I'm still clueless for what. > > > > > > > > > With the present setup (without gitbox): this is how u have to merge > the > > > PRs (the cumbersome, manual way) - > > > http://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html > > > > > > With gitbox setup, this is how u do it (the way its supposed to be, see > > the > > > section merging a Pull Request) - > > http://opennlp.apache.org/using-git.html > > > > > > > Thanks, that is helpful, even if IMO still very thin, too thin, > > documentation. > > > > So I understand that with gitbox the (primary?) upstream repository to > > push to > > now is @github, no longer @apache. Or might this be both? > > > > However https://github.com/apache/opennlp still indicates it is mirrored > > from > > git://git.apache.org/opennlp.git. > > Then are these now bidirectionally synchronized? If so, then how are > > conflicts > > resolved/prevented, shouldn't there some guidelines/rules for that? > > Is it still allowed or even possible to push to the repository @apache? > > > > The OpenNLP website doesn't provide any help or explanation either, > while I > > think important usage rules like these need to be spelled out and > > documented by > > the project. > > > > Another question: will we (have to) stick to using JIRA for issue > > tracking, or > > with gitbox might github issue tracking be used as well? > > Note: I think the latter to be not such a great idea. > > Also: is it possible to add JIRA integration with the Github repository? > > > > Great question. IIRC, there is no real requirement to use JIRA for a > project's defect tracking, it is just common to do so. Any particular > reason you dislike GitHub issues? It might further simplify the workflow. > There is gitbox - jira integration in place and its (finally!) functional, so nothing changes on that front. > > > > > > > OpenNLP JIRA issues don't show or link to/index related git commits while > > IMO > > *that* would be very useful to have. > > > > Anyhow, I understand the benefit of directly using and pushing to github > > so I'm OK and +1 on moving to gitbox if this now is an 'endorsed' > solution > > at > > Apache. > > > > But I also strongly dislike the fact there is zero documentation and also > > no > > Apache guidelines how gitbox can and may, and may not, be used. > > > > Agree on the lack of documentation. Since @smarthi is a big proponent, > maybe he will improve the documentation ;) > > I am a big proponent of all things verbal, and completely anti-documentation. Sorry i will not be able to help with improving the documentation. :) > > > > > Ate > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> If anything, it greatly simplifies committer workflow as Steve's > > >>>>> mentioned > > >>>>> before. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> How, in which way? > > >>>> Sure, I get github and git in general, but I cannot find *any* > > >>>> explanation > > >>>> or documentation concerning gitbox. > > >>>> > > >>>> I won't, can't really, vote positively on this without some context. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 2017-07-05 19:22, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> This is a vote to move all streams repos to Gitbox, some of the > > other > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> projects have started to move their repos to gitbox. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This was discussed before, and while I probably will be +1, > > >>>>>> I'm still clueless what gitbox provides, allows, enabled and what > > >>>>>> restrictions/limitations it imposes. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> While I suppose it to be 'cool' and 'it'll be great', as (P)PMC we > > >>>>>> should *know* what we're getting (or accepting) by moving to > gitbox, > > >>>>>> *before* deciding. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Here's my +1 binding. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This vote will close in 72 hrs. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > >
