One proposal that's a bit more concrete is Ted's struts-jericho contrib; it contains a proposed DTD which shows how the classes could be organized. Also, there's been some discussion on Struts 2 ideas before: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-dev&w=2&r=1&s=Struts+2.0+Ideas+&q=b
- Hubert On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 14:52:37 -0500, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as the struts roadmap for 2.x I would say that it is fairly > vague for anyone setting out to develop an initial codebase. It > mentions supporting JSF, it talks about portlets, and many other > things. But it talks about these things vaguely as if they were 5 > years off. I am just saying that if someone is going to begin a 2.x > development there should be some serious discussion about what it > should look like. I would say a wiki on this would be great. Maybe > StrutsNewVersion or something. I don't do much with the wiki, can I > just create a new page if I'm registered on it? > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:33:15 +0100, Niall Pemberton > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Maybe the "whiteboard" area is good fot this... > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWhiteboard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:31 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > > > Struts has a roadmap here: > > > > > > http://struts.apache.org/roadmap.html > > > > > > but maybe it would be easier/better to have something in the wiki, then > > lots > > > of people could easily contribute > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:12 PM > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > > > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > > > > > > > Doesn't a struts 2.x codebase need a roadmap first? Should there be > > > some defined goals? Should it implement the same apis as struts 1.x > > > so as to ease transition? Or should it be a whole new framework? > > > Somehow I think the latter would be ill received. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
