You can also look at the whiteboard initially setup by Ted in contrib/struts-jericho/README.txt
-- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > Maybe the "whiteboard" area is good fot this... > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWhiteboard > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:31 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > > Struts has a roadmap here: > > > > http://struts.apache.org/roadmap.html > > > > but maybe it would be easier/better to have something in the wiki, then > lots > > of people could easily contribute > > > > Niall > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > > > > Doesn't a struts 2.x codebase need a roadmap first? Should there be > > some defined goals? Should it implement the same apis as struts 1.x > > so as to ease transition? Or should it be a whole new framework? > > Somehow I think the latter would be ill received. > > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:02:45 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:43:37 +0200, Anders Steinlein wrote: > > > >ïJust want to throw in my voice here, as this is exactly what I've > > > >ïbeen thinking. I'm very pleased with Struts and use it on a daily > > > >ïbasis and I would love to contribute, but I don't really have the > > > >ïitches or time to fully read up on the current code. However, upon > > > >ïthe development of a "revolution"-Struts, I and surely many others > > > >ïwould be inspired to get involved right from the start. Just the > > > >ïthought of a Struts fully based on Servlet 2.4, JSP 2.0 and > > > >ïpossibly even J2SE 5.0 makes me all warm inside. ;) > > > > > > The best part is that we can have our cake and eat it too :) > > > > > > Those with itches for Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0/J2SE 5.0 can begin work on > > Struts 2.x, while others continue to maintain and enhance Struts 1.x. > > > > > > Many projects operate in a mode like this, including Apache HTTPD and > > Tomcat. > > > > > > We just need someone to step up and say, "OK, here's some starter code > for > > Struts 2.x, let's have at it." > > > > > > Meanwhile, those interested in the Struts 1.x base can maintain the > status > > quo. > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
