As far as the struts roadmap for 2.x I would say that it is fairly vague for anyone setting out to develop an initial codebase. It mentions supporting JSF, it talks about portlets, and many other things. But it talks about these things vaguely as if they were 5 years off. I am just saying that if someone is going to begin a 2.x development there should be some serious discussion about what it should look like. I would say a wiki on this would be great. Maybe StrutsNewVersion or something. I don't do much with the wiki, can I just create a new page if I'm registered on it?
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:33:15 +0100, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe the "whiteboard" area is good fot this... > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWhiteboard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:31 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > Struts has a roadmap here: > > > > http://struts.apache.org/roadmap.html > > > > but maybe it would be easier/better to have something in the wiki, then > lots > > of people could easily contribute > > > > Niall > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move minimum to 2.3 (was Re: Changing how > > CommonsMultipartRequestHandler handles text parameters?) > > > > > > Doesn't a struts 2.x codebase need a roadmap first? Should there be > > some defined goals? Should it implement the same apis as struts 1.x > > so as to ease transition? Or should it be a whole new framework? > > Somehow I think the latter would be ill received. > > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:02:45 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:43:37 +0200, Anders Steinlein wrote: > > > >ïJust want to throw in my voice here, as this is exactly what I've > > > >ïbeen thinking. I'm very pleased with Struts and use it on a daily > > > >ïbasis and I would love to contribute, but I don't really have the > > > >ïitches or time to fully read up on the current code. However, upon > > > >ïthe development of a "revolution"-Struts, I and surely many others > > > >ïwould be inspired to get involved right from the start. Just the > > > >ïthought of a Struts fully based on Servlet 2.4, JSP 2.0 and > > > >ïpossibly even J2SE 5.0 makes me all warm inside. ;) > > > > > > The best part is that we can have our cake and eat it too :) > > > > > > Those with itches for Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0/J2SE 5.0 can begin work on > > Struts 2.x, while others continue to maintain and enhance Struts 1.x. > > > > > > Many projects operate in a mode like this, including Apache HTTPD and > > Tomcat. > > > > > > We just need someone to step up and say, "OK, here's some starter code > for > > Struts 2.x, let's have at it." > > > > > > Meanwhile, those interested in the Struts 1.x base can maintain the > status > > quo. > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
