I note below my biggest WISH for Struts that would be easy to accommodate and which would transform the usefulness of Struts, in my opinion, in a MAJOR way.
<SNIP> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:33:42 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack, if you want to throw away ActionForm -- go for > it! </SNIP> I have no interest in throwing away ActionForm. I am a huge advocate of the use of <html:form> tags. Since you seem to think that this somehow is or was a desire of mine, I should say that has never been and never will be my desire. Rather, I would prefer if we could make ActionMappings such that a single action could result in the instantiation of two or more ActionForm objects rather than one. This would simply my architecture immensely. This also would be easy to do. This would allow coders to be action-centric rather than page-centric and still be able to tie ActionForm, as originally envisioned, to <html:form>. As things are now, an OOP programmer has to use one ActionForm to span two pages. Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
