On 4/22/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:56 AM -0500 4/22/05, Hubert Rabago wrote: > >Config inheritance changes have been checked in. > >http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=159806 > > > >I gotta ask, what projects/subprojects are going to be included with a > >1.3 release? And what version numbers are we going to give them? > >"Taglib 1.3.0"? > > We should probably release: > > core > el > taglib > tiles > > together, at least initially, since they essentially constitute the > equivalent of what is in Struts 1.2. (Well, 'el' isn't in Struts > 1.2, but it's pretty stable and it closely tracks 'taglib') > > For the initial release, all should be 1.3.0. As Ted has described > it in the past, their versions may change independently in the > future, so that we may eventually end up with something like the J2EE > spec. (To be honest, I'm not crazy about that, as I can never recall > which versions of J2EE components match up with which versions of the > overall spec, but we WANTED to be able to cut independent releases.)
+1 to all that. Do we need / want to get the docs divided out into the subprojects before we do 1.3.0, or are people happy enough to leave them all dumped in 'core' for now? > I can't think of anything we really wanted to (or need to) get done > that is blocking a release, There is one blocker right now: We need Commons Chain 1.1 released. At one point (on the commons-dev list) Craig had said he'd take a look through and see if he was happy enough with what's there now that we could release it, but I don't believe we heard back. I can probably roll a release of that this weekend, if people think the code base is in good enough shape. Maybe I'll ping the commons-dev list again... > although now that I go looking, it seems > as though the tiles version of chain-config.xml has disappeared! I > have a copy in an old SVN checkout from before I started using the > "current" virtual directory, but I don't see any signs of it now and > SVN is giving me errors when I try to research its history -- what's > the deal? > > >Are we also going to do a 1.2.7? > > I think it's a good idea, since some decent changes have come into > the 1.2 branch since the last GA release. 1.2.6 is close enough to > GA, but we really ought to get a real one. The big hole in 1.2.6 was the EL tags being out of sync with the non-EL tags. That was fixed a while ago, and as you say, there have been some additional fixes as well. I'm definitely +1 to doing a 1.2.7. If we're ready, I should have some time to roll that this weekend. -- Martin Cooper > Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
