> I would also vote for "org.apache.tiles" - my guess it would be more > platable to other frameworks if there isn't a "struts" in the name. It might > make people think there was a struts dependency with "struts" in the package > name. Also, if the consensus is to move out as a TLP in the future, then > there wouldn't be a need to change package names at that point.
Excellent points. I agree with that reasoning. sean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
