+1 for the plan, but with the following comment on the release plan dependencies:
The release plan is showing Commons Validator 1.1.4 - but the website/build.xml has Validator 1.2.0. Also looking at the build.xml, the dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on the website or in the release plan (Codec 1.2, Collections 3.0 and FileUpload 1.0). One other thing about the actual build - I was wondering why just one "all-in-one" build rather than the usual source/binary distros? Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:02 PM All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote confirming it: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease100 At this time, I would ask the PMC, committers, and other interested parties to review the plan, and the state of the repository, and indicate your acceptance of the plan in the usual way (+1, +0, -0, -1) along with appropriate comments. This vote will run from now (approximately 2pm Pacific time on Thursday, 12/01/2005) for 96 hours, until 2pm on Monday, 12/05/2005) -- four days instead of three because of the weekend. If the plan is accepted, I intend to post the 1.0.0 build on Monday. This is not a vote on the quality of the release itself. I expect that this release will not graduate beyond alpha quality (due in part to dependence on an unreleased Standalone Tiles component, but also to correctly set expectiations for API stability). Here's my +1 to kick things off. Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
