On 12/21/05, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but I'm going to try to tweak this proposal with the hope that > it makes this whole discussion even simpler: > > I propose we get rid of the name Ti entirely. Just as there is no such > thing as a Struts framework (Struts Shale and Struts Action, right?), > I propose that from this day forth we shun the name "Ti".
The problem is that we have a sandbox project named "ti" that was the original (i.e. pre WebWork merger) experimentation area. That has a good chunk of work in it, including some of Don's rapid development stuff and Rich's Beehive integration, and I think we'll most likely want to pull pieces of that into Action 2.0 as we go along. Instead, we agree to make what was Struts Ti phase 1 effectively > Struts Action 2.0. This is no different from what Don is suggesting. > On top of that I recommend we agree that Struts Ti phase 2 (flow, > annotation, Rails-style development, etc) be henceforth known as > Struts Action 2.x. In short, we agree that we'll do it in a future 2.x > release. The idea is to get rid of the Ti name for these Phase 1 and Phase 2 pieces, and simply use the term Struts Action 2.x for those. We refer to Phase 1 as Struts Action 2.0, and Phase 2 is just more on the roadmap for what comes after that. No need to muddle the Ti name into this. I'm +1 on Don's #1 and #2, because it leaves Ti meaning what it originally meant - an experimental sandbox area - and uses Struts Action 2.x for the "production" work we're embarking on. -- Martin Cooper It may be that some of these features, like other features of Struts > Action 1.x (Tiles, Tags, etc) will eventually be rolled out in to > their own project, but for now I propose we just agree to move forward > on Struts Action 2.x and let natural selection take place as time goes > on and spinoffs potentially take place. > > Patrick > > On 12/21/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you everyone for your quick feedback. Based on the various > > comments and discussions, I'd like to revise my proposal: > > > > 1. Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0 > > - Will contain WebWork, Struts migration tools, commons-chain > > integration, and other small improvements > > > > 2. Leave Ti to explore simplified development according to original > goals > > - Workflow/Page Flow integration, annotation-driven development, etc > > > > To be determined: > > - Should we make Action 2.0 /trunk or start a new branch? > > > > I'd like to call for a discussion and vote on the first points, leaving > > the third for discussion and a future vote. > > > > Don > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
